The debate over training intensity resurfaced after Dorian Yates criticized the rising use of “reps in reserve.” The six-time Mr. Olympia argued that the philosophy encourages athletes to hold back. Moreover, he warned that it runs against the principles that built his career.

Next, Yates pushed back on the idea that effort should be measured in what you don’t do. He claimed bodybuilding progress is rooted in all-out exertion, not strategic restraint. Furthermore, he said that athletes who leave reps “in the tank” misunderstand what real intensity means.

Finally, his criticism sparked renewed discussion across the community. Many lifters questioned whether modern training methods have lost their edge. Others said Yates is simply protecting the hard-nosed style that defined his era.

“My opinion on ‘reps in reserve’… Like I’ve said before, I only know where 0 and 100 are. Just train hard to failure. Training does NOT need to be complicated.” — Dorian Yates

Yates explained that the human body adapts only when pushed to its limits. He said intensity, not carefully measured effort, drives consistent muscle growth. Additionally, he insisted that athletes cannot “calculate” progress through formulas.

Then, he argued that RIR is simply too tame. He described it as a structured excuse to stop early. He suggested that the method allows lifters to avoid discomfort instead of meeting it head-on.

Lastly, he emphasized that nothing valuable happens before failure. He insisted that the moment the muscle begins burning is precisely where growth begins — not where a set should end.

“Reps in reserve… we’ve got a different term for that in England. It’s called a wanker’s workout.” — Dorian Yates

Yates revisited the principles that guided his “Blood and Guts” training. He said one all-out working set, taken to the edge, is superior to multiple moderate attempts. He credited that approach for his dramatic physique changes over the years.

Next, he discussed the role of forced reps, negatives, and partials. He used them as tools to push beyond failure — not before it. These techniques, he said, created the extreme density and hardness that marked his stage presence.

Finally, he reminded athletes that bodybuilding rewards grit. He acknowledged the pain that comes with his methods but added that it is the price of true progress.

“That final, all-out working set… one all-out set to and often beyond failure is what’s needed.” — Dorian Yates

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Dorian Yates (@thedorianyates)

How the Industry Responded

Many lifters agreed with Yates that modern training has grown overly technical. They said RIR reflects a shift toward safety and science over sheer drive. Still, they argued that not everyone needs to train at the extreme edges of capacity.

Then, supporters of RIR defended the method. They claimed that it reduces central fatigue, lowers injury risk, and allows higher weekly volumes. They said science supports strategic submaximal training for experienced athletes.

Finally, the discussion expanded beyond methodology. The debate sparked conversations about generational styles, athlete longevity, and the changing culture of bodybuilding.

“I don’t like it when… the muscle starts burning… and it feels uncomfortable. Who wants to be uncomfortable? It can’t be good for you now, can it?” —  

Dorian Yates Reps in Reserve

For more news and updates, follow colosseum strength on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

Overview